Tuesday, December 2, 2014

One Room Schoolhouses: What Might They Teach Us About Differentiation?
by Alma Pettenger, SPS Professional Learning Specialist

Standard #3: Curriculum Implementation 
Quality Indicator #2: Develop lessons for diverse learners

I have fond memories of watching the American television drama Little House on the Prairie when I was a child. I enjoyed learning about the simplicity of life in the 1800’s.  As an educator I marvel at the challenges the teacher, Laura Ingalls, faced in a one room schoolhouse. She had to divide her time, her resources, and the content between students who didn't know the basic skill of holding a pencil and students who were already proficient readers. 

“Students are more diverse than ever – culturally, emotionally, economically, physically, and intellectually” (Wormeli, 2007, p.3).  Although the one room schoolhouse model is almost extinct in the United States, its underlying theme of differentiation is very much alive in our schools today.

Why did one room schoolhouses work?

A safe classroom environment is one of the fundamental building blocks of effective differentiation.  Josh Getlin, a New York City writer, spent some time at a one room schoolhouse in South Dakota. When he asked the teacher this very question, her answer was: “It works because we are basically one large family unit…” (One-Room School – Little School House on the Prairie).  If we are to implement effective differentiated instruction, teachers must learn to build trusting learning environments where students feel free to take risks and make mistakes.  By teaching the value of effort over talent and ability, a teacher creates a safe classroom environment and communicates clearly that every student can succeed. “No matter what your ability is, effort is what ignites that ability and turns it into accomplishment” (Dweck, p. 20).

Assessment is critical in academically diverse classrooms; it is how teachers know the readiness levels of their students.  Readiness is a student’s entry point relative to a particular understanding or skill (Tomlinson, p. 11).  In the old, one room schoolhouse, students moved on as they mastered goals and skills.   Today, to achieve effective differentiation, assessment must be ongoing and diagnostic (Tomlinson, p. 10). The teacher must ask, “What do my students know before the instructional sequence begins? How is their learning progressing?  How did they measure at the end of the unit? What should I plan next for them? Assessment informs instruction; without it, purposeful differentiation is simply not possible (Heacox, p.25).   

Knowledge of students is what allows effective teachers to make appropriate decisions about the learning experiences that will lead learners to academic achievement.  Keith Hall is a 13 year old boy who attends a one room school house in Alabama.  When asked about his success in his current school compared to his previous school, he said: “This one is different… At my old school, it would take them half the year just to know you.  Here, they keep track of stuff…” (Wilgoren, 2000). In addition to knowing students’ readiness levels, effective teachers seek to know students’ interest and learning profile.  Interest refers to a student’s affinity, curiosity, or passion for a particular topic or skill while learning profile has to do with how we learn (Tomlinson, p. 11).

Some educators consider differentiation  a passing fad. However, the one room schoolhouse has taught us that effective teachers have long been differentiating instruction. “Going forward, teachers will need the strategies of differentiation until the day they walk into classrooms where all students are at the same readiness level, learn at the same pace in the same way, and exhibit similar interests. Obviously, this day is unlikely to arrive” (Heacox, p. 19).

What might be some changes you could implement in your instruction to meet the diverse needs in your own one room schoolhouse?


Dweck, Carol S (2006). Mindset. The New Psychology of Success. New York: Ballatine Books

Getlin, Josh (1997).  One-Room School – Little School House on the Prairie. Deadwood Magazine.  Black Hills, South Dakota.  Web. Nov. 2014.

Heacox, Diane (2007). Making Differentiation a Habit. Free Spirit Publishing.

Tomlinson, Carol Ann (1999). The Differentiated Classroom. ASDC.

Wilgoren, Jodi (August 6, 2000). The one-room schoolhouse. The New York Times on the Web.  Web. Nov. 2014.

Wormeli, Rick (2007). Differentiation: From Planning to Practice. Stenhouse Publishers. 
Standard #3 of the New Missouri Teacher Evaluation System – Curriculum Implementation 
by Hope Gallamore, SPS Secondary Reading Support Specialist and Ann Wallenmeyer, SPS Coordinator, Strategic Instruction

As our world becomes more complex, the expectations for student learning have increased. The sheer quantity of standards our students must “know and be able to do” requires a thoughtful integration of standards across the curriculum. Teachers are called to move from teaching any objectives to intentionally selecting essential national, state and district standards.  

The new Missouri teacher evaluation system captures this expectation for teachers in Standard #3: Curriculum Implementation.  This standard includes three quality indicators:  implementation of curriculum standards, lessons for diverse learners, and instructional goals and differentiated instructional strategies. 

To assist classrooms with the implementation of these rigorous standards, teacher teams in SPS meet to select aligned resources and create curriculum guides.  These guides, created “for teachers, by teachers,” include success criteria, formative and summative assessments, instructional strategies, and differentiated activities.  Teacher teams are also working to identify prioritized standards along with proficiency rubrics to help focus instruction around the curriculum standards.  The guides are housed in Canvas for easy access: https://springfieldpublicschools.instructure.com/courses/181130/pages/curriculum.

In SPS, “learning is personal” and teachers continue to work to integrate process skills seamlessly with content by creating real-world applications that engage students. Teachers are finding additional support for student enrichment and intervention with products such as ALEKS, i-Ready, READ 180, System 44, and supplemental materials found in the current SPS adopted resources.  Teams provide additional support for the workshop model, guided reading, and writing across the content areas to help differentiate learning and engage students. 

The Curriculum Team continues to listen to your input as they seek additional ways to support learning for ALL students.

For your reference, this is the description of Standard #3: Curriculum Implementation:

The teacher recognizes the importance of long-range planning and curriculum development. The teacher develops, implements, and evaluates curriculum based upon student, district and state standards data. [SB 291 Section 160.045.2 (1) Students actively participate and are successful in the learning process; (2) Various forms of assessment are used to monitor and manage student learning; (3) The teacher is prepared and knowledgeable of the content and effectively maintains students’ on-task behavior; (5) The teacher keeps current on instructional knowledge and seeks and explores teaching behaviors that will improve student performance.]

Quality Indicator 1: Implementation of curriculum standards
Quality Indicator 2: Lessons for diverse learners
Quality Indicator 3: Instructional goals and differentiated instructional strategies